Monday, October 22, 2012

Humanities Homework: Medieval Blog Post


The Cathedral starts out by the narrator introducing a blind man who is coming to stay with him and his wife. The way he describes this visit has no excitement in it whatsoever. He tells the story how his wife and the blind man met year before, and how they had always kept in touch. He seems bitter and jealous about the blind man coming to stay at his home; a stranger, who he has only heard of from his wife, who is blind. His stereotype of this blind man was very generalized, and he liked to joke about it in a very dry, sarcastic way, that was funny to his wife. He could see that his wife was very tense about her friend coming, she wanted everything to be perfect and that made the narrator jealous. He didn’t seem happy with his life, he didn’t seem totally in love with his wife and listening to her get excited about her friend coming wasn’t helping.

When Robert, the blind man, finally comes he becomes very skeptical. How was this blind man normal? Throughout the story, he slowly becomes comfortable with Robert, finding out that they have a lot in common. He slowly begins to see that Robert was just like any other human being.

Another view of a person that changed for the narrator was his wife. I think he came to the realization that he didn’t know a lot about her. She was almost a totally different person when Robert came, and he learned that he seemed to know more about her than he did, and I think that also brought upon a lot of bitterness and jealousy about Robert.

 Robert and the narrator are different in many ways, especially in the way they view things. The narrator is really negative and selfish, where Robert views things on a more positive and free spirited level. The narrator is very stubborn, he feels that what he already knows in life is good enough for him, where Robert, who is much older, still strives to learn whatever he can.

A very distinct similarity between the two characters is that there is a sense of loneliness. The narrator is too laid back, he doesn’t see outside his little world that is all about him. He loneliness is more of a mental loneliness. He doesn’t seem to have the best relationship with his wife, which he mentions when he says that they rarely go to bed at the same time, and that he always sits by himself to smoke and drink late at night. The blind man is also alone, but in a more physical way. His wife has passed away, and all he has left is his blind old self.

The narrator and the blind man truly connect at the end of the story, when a TV program comes on about cathedrals. When Robert asks him to describe what the cathedral looks like, the narrator is able to step into his shoes, and view a world where everything comes from your own image. There was such beauty and significant detail in describing to Robert what a cathedral looked like, and then for them to draw it together with no sight. I think the narrator got a sense of joy here, he felt alive though he could not see with his eyes close. He saw the world as Robert saw it, with beautiful and significant detail. It also portrayed the darkness’s both felt in their life. Robert’s world was literally dark, and the narrator’s was dark in the sense that he had no passion for anything; he was alone and had a dark and cold soul. Comparing that to cathedrals, they have a dark sense to them. But they are also so beautifully built that you can’t help but see the beauty in the dark, cold, and empty feeling you have about them.

Monday, October 15, 2012

Humanities Homework: Greece Blog Post


     I really liked The Charioteer of Delphi statue (page 110 in The Art of Being Human).  I liked the description the book gives it, “it shows that classical Greek artists did indeed imitate real people.”  It also talks about the young man being without flaws, that he was a chariot driver, not a god.  He was human.  I think that brings great significance to this piece, we are able to see the vision of a perfect human form in Greek times instead of a God or other perfect being to be compared too.  The sculpture is very detailed in human form, and I think that showing that great of detail proves the artist knew a lot about the human body and structure, which had to have been a great knowledge to have, when compared to today knowing we are still learning more and more about the human body. 

     I think it serves a few purposes.  One, it shows real human structure, a real person.  And that itself shows significance.  Two, it proves the understanding the Greeks had about the human body was very detailed and precise, and three, it shows the endurance of a charioteer; A young, strong, victorious, and self- disciplined man of Greece.  His emotion is serious and in deep thought, just like when one faces a crowd and has to put on a so called, “brave face.”  I think it connects to my world view, and the world today in the way of how we view human nature and the journey that goes along with it.  Young adults have to stand in the face of a “crowd” (the world), they must choose how to be strong and self- disciplined in today’s society.  Society today has put a lot of pressure of people to look like the “perfect human,” to have the perfect body and perfect life, etc.  We have to choose how to face and deal with that type of pressure, either to turn and shy away, or to stand and face it and reach to be victorious, just like a charioteer.